Commission
Meeting
December 15, 2011
The
Meeting was called to order at 4:00 P.M. at The Project Headquarters
Those
present were: Norman
Jacques, Chair
Robin L. Chapell, Vice-Chair
Maureen
P. MacEachern
Linda
R. Shea
John
J. Smith, Director
The minutes of the November 15, 2011 Commission
Meeting were unanimously accepted on a motion by Mrs. Shea, seconded by Mrs.
MacEachern.
The Commission heard a report from the Director on
the SRMCB meeting that took place on December 14th, 2011 in
The Assistant Director briefed the Commission on the
field work accomplished chart, which showed close to year-end figures. The
field work accomplished report was unanimously accepted on a motion by Mrs.
Chapell, and seconded by Mrs. MacEachern.
The Commission was briefed on the Director’s
retirement plans. The Director also briefed the Commission on their options for
transition to a new Director. The Human Resources Director of the Department of
Agriculture had indicated that there were two options for this transition
(promote from within, or do an outside search). Mrs. Chapell made a motion,
stating that since the project had a very competent candidate in house, that
the Commission should promote the current Assistant Director to the Directors
position following the retirement of the Director. The idea was to give the
Assistant Director a raise (TBD) after the Director leaves service but is still
on payroll (Assistant Director working as an Acting Director), and then another
raise (TBD) when the Director officially retires and is off the payroll. The
motion was seconded by Mrs. Shea and unanimously accepted.
The Commission unanimously voted to make Mrs.
Chapell, Chairman and Mr. Pollack the Vice-Chair effective at the next Commission
meeting in the calendar year 2012, on a motion by Mrs. Shea and a second by Mr.
Jacques.
The next 2 meeting dates were set as January 19th,
2012 at 4:00 P.M. and February 9th, 2012 at 4:00 P.M., both at the
Project Headquarters.
At 5:05 P.M. the meeting was adjourned on a motion
by Mrs. Shea.
Respectfully submitted,
Norman
Jacques, Chairman
Norfolk
County Mosquito Control Project
Commission
Meeting
November
15, 2011
The
Meeting was called to order at 8:30 A.M. at
Those
present were: Norman
Jacques, Chair
Robin L. Chapell, Vice-Chair
Maureen
P. MacEachern
Richard
J. Pollack
Linda
R. Shea
John
J. Smith, Director
Caroline
Haviland
Nathaniel
Boonisar
Channsotha
Suom
The minutes of the November 3, 2011 Commission
Meeting were unanimously accepted on a motion by Mr. Pollack, seconded by Mrs.
MacEachern.
This meeting primarily consisted of a PowerPoint
presentation by the office staff of the district to the public as part of our
compliance with the SRMCB Budget Policy*. Three members of the public were
present (1 for a short duration) for this presentation. After the presentation
a time for question and answers was offered but no questions were posed from
the members of the audience.
At 10:00 A.M. the meeting was adjourned on a motion
by Mrs. Shea.
Respectfully submitted,
Robin
L. Chapell, Vice-Chair
*A
record of these presentations was made available on the project website.
Opening
Remarks http://www.massnrc.org/ncmcp/Research/SRB%20Meeting/FY2013%20Opening%20Remarks.ppsx
Surveillance
& Outreach http://www.massnrc.org/ncmcp/Research/SRB%20Meeting/FY2013%20Surveillance%20Outreach.ppsx
Water
Management http://www.massnrc.org/ncmcp/Research/SRB%20Meeting/FY2013%20Water%20Management.ppsx
Geographic
Information System http://www.massnrc.org/ncmcp/Research/SRB%20Meeting/FY2013%20GIS.ppsx
Larvicide & Adulticide http://www.massnrc.org/ncmcp/Research/SRB%20Meeting/FY2013%20Larvicide%20Adulticide.ppsx
FY
2013 Budget Review http://www.massnrc.org/ncmcp/Research/SRB%20Meeting/FY2013%20Budget%20Presentation.ppsx
Commission
Meeting
November
03, 2011
The
Meeting was called to order at 4:03 P.M. in the office of the Project.
Those
present were: Robin
L. Chapell, Vice-Chair
Maureen
P. MacEachern
Richard
J. Pollack
Linda
R. Shea
John
J. Smith, Director
The minutes of the September 22, 2011 Commission
Meeting were unanimously accepted on a motion by Mrs. Chapell, seconded by Mrs.
Shea.
As part of the Budgetary
Control Report the Director indicated that he wanted the Assistant Director to
review the budget presentation with the commission. This PowerPoint
presentation is to be presented as part of the annual budget meeting which will
be held at the
The commission then engaged
the Director and Assistant Director in discussion regarding the recent SRMCB
meeting on October 26th, 2011. An updated Budget Policy had been
presented at this meeting, but voting on the policy was tabled to a later
meeting that is to be held December 14, 2011. After the October 26th
SRMCB meeting, Commissioners Pollack, Shea, and Chapell agreed to contact town
officials in the towns that they work in and reside in, with the intent of
receiving feedback from them on the proposed policy update. Commissioners
Pollack, Shea, and Chapell, shared feedback they had received from various town
officials regarding this policy. It was noted that feedback from
The Fieldwork Accomplished
Report was then reviewed by the Commission. Following a review by the Assistant
Director of a spreadsheet detailing the year-to-date fieldwork accomplished,
the Commission unanimously accepted the Fieldwork Accomplished Report on a
motion by Mrs. Shea, seconded by Mrs. MacEachern.
At 5:17 P.M. the meeting was adjourned on a motion
by Mrs. Shea.
Respectfully submitted,
Robin
L. Chapell, Vice-Chair
Commission
Meeting September
22, 2011
The Meeting was called to
order at 4:00 P.M. in the office of the Project.
Those
present were: Norman P. Jacques,
Chairman
Maureen
P. MacEachern
Linda
R. Shea
Richard
J. Pollack
Robin
L. Chapell
John J.
Smith, Director
The minutes of the August 11,
2011, Commission
Mrs. MacEachern,
seconded by Mrs. Shea.
The
Commission then discussed options for the location and time of the upcoming
Budget Meeting required under the State Reclamation and Mosquito Control Boards
(SRMCB) “Massachusetts Mosquito Control Budget Notification and Compliance
Certification Policy”. The Commission
agreed that the
The Commission then reviewed
the Fieldwork Accomplished Report year-to-date.
The Director informed the Commission that an emergency ground ULV application
had to be conducted in the Town of
Mrs. Shea, the Commission
unanimously accepted the Fieldwork Accomplished Report.
The Commission agreed to the
following two meeting dates:
1.
Regular Meeting
of the Commission, Thursday, November 3, 2011 at 4:00 P.M. in the office of the
Project.
2.
Regular Meeting
of the Commission, Thursday, December 15, 2011 at 4:00 P.M. in the office of
the Project.
On a motion by Mrs. Chapell
the meeting was adjourned at 5:05 P.M.
Respectfully
submitted,
Norman P. Jacques, Chairman
Norfolk
County Mosquito Control Project
Commission
Meeting
August
11, 2011
The
Meeting was called to order at 4:00 P.M. in the office of the Project.
Those
present were: Norman P.
Jacques, Chairman
Maureen
P. MacEachern
Linda
R. Shea
Richard
J. Pollack
Robin
L. Chapell
The
minutes of the June 30, 2011 Commission
The
Director then presented the Commission with three options for the FY 2013
Budget. These were as follows:
Budget % increase
Case 1 Maintain 5
Field FTE’s/ one truck / one back-up sprayer
Sub-option 1 - no summer aerial larvicide $1,561,942 5.5%
Sub-option 2 - include summer aerial larvicide $1,709,842 15.5%
Case 2 Hire 6th
Field FTE / one truck / one back-up sprayer
Sub-option 1 - no summer aerial larvicide $1,618,227 9.3%
Sub-option 2 – include summer aerial larvicide $1,766,127 19.3%
Sub-option 3 – buy 2 trucks instead of one add $18,000 $1,784,127 20.5%
The Commission discussed each
option and after considerable debate agreed unanimously on a motion by Mrs.
Shea, seconded by Mrs. Chapell to, upon the request of the State Reclamation
and Mosquito Control Board, submit a budget request for FY 2013 totaling $1,766,127
(Case 2 – sub-option 2) which includes the addition of a sixth field employee
(FTE) and funding for a summer aerial larval control application. The
Commission instructed the Director to begin preparing all the necessary
supporting justification for this budget including an analysis for adding an
additional sixth field employee. The Director was instructed to have
preliminary drafts of these justifications for Commission review at the next
regular meeting of the Commission. The Commission agreed to table a review of
an FY 2012 Supplement Budget until the next regular Commission meeting.
The Assistant Director then
reviewed with the Commission the Fieldwork Accomplished Report year-to-date.
The Director complimented this report with a review of the
The next regular meeting of
the Commission will be on September 22, 2011 at 4:00 P.M. in the office of the
Project.
On a motion by Mr. Pollack
the meeting was adjourned at 4:45 P.M.
Respectfully
submitted,
Norman P. Jacques, Chairman
Commission
Meeting
June
30, 2011
The
Meeting was called to order at 8:30 A.M. in the office of the Project.
Those
present were: Norman P.
Jacques, Chairman
Maureen
P. MacEachern
Linda
R. Shea
Richard
J. Pollack
Robin
L. Chapell
The
minutes of the June 16, 2011 Commission
The
Commission then reviewed a revised draft letter from the Cape Cod Mosquito
Control Project relative to a review of the recent budget cycle involving the
State Reclamation and Mosquito Control Board. The Commission instructed the
Director to include in the minutes of this meeting that they had reviewed the
letter and to keep them informed relative to this issue. On a motion by Mr.
Pollack, seconded by Mrs. Shea, the Commission agreed unanimously that it
should appear in the minutes that they support the Cape Cod Mosquito Control
Projects letter.
The
Director then briefed the Commission on the status of operations at the Norfolk
County Mosquito Control Project. The Director noted that there was no extra
capacity available operationally in the program due to recent restrictions in
funding. The Director indicated that manpower and equipment are maxed out. The
Director went on to explain that one of the five field technicians was retiring
unexpectedly and that manpower would be further limited until the Project is
able to replace this employee which may not be until late in the summer. The
Director detailed for the Commission the impact of vehicle/sprayer breakdowns
on services to the member communities. The Director noted that it is imperative
that older equipment be replaced and that the field technician staffing level
be increased so that the Project can maintain adequate manpower to address the
summer surges in resident requests caused by unexpected mosquito population
increases and the occurrence of WNv and EEE..
Following a lengthy discussion relative to manpower and equipment capacity the
Commission agreed, on a motion by Mrs. Chapell, seconded by Mrs. Shea to take a
look at the FY2012 Budget to see if the Project can cover these unforeseen
expenses and if not then the Commission would consider submission of a
supplemental budget for FY 2012.
The next regular meeting of
the Commission will be on August 11, 2011 at 4:00 P.M. in the office of the
Project.
On a motion by Mrs. Chapell
the meeting was adjourned at 8:55 A.M.
Respectfully
submitted,
Norman P. Jacques, Chairman
Commission
Meeting
June
16, 2011
The
Meeting was called to order at 4:00 P.M. in the office of the Project.
Those
present were: Norman P.
Jacques, Chairman
Maureen
P. MacEachern
Linda
R. Shea
Richard
J. Pollack
Robin
L. Chapell
The
minutes of the May 5, 2011 Commission
The
Director then presented the Commission the Budgetary Control Report which
included a review of the final FY 2012 budget as certified by the State
Reclamation and Mosquito Control Board (the Board) at their meeting held on
June 3, 2011. The Director noted that the Board had modified the Commissions
budget request downward to a level of $1, 480,292. The Director reviewed with the
Commission the impacts this reduced budget would have on Project services. The
Director indicated that the most notable impact would be to the spring and
summer aerial applications. The Director provided the Commission with a budget
spreadsheet which included a calculator for determining what level of aerial
coverage the Project will be able to provide. The Director indicated that if a
summer aerial application was required then the subsequent spring application
would be limited. The Director also noted that capital funds to replace aging
vehicles would not be available given the restrictions in this Board modified
budget.
As
part of the Budgetary Control Report, the Commission considered the pay rates
of the hourly employees. Assistant Director Lawson reviewed with the Commission
a poll he had conducted with the Departments of Public Works (DPWs) in the member communities. Mr. Lawson noted that he
had received both Step Rate and Cost of Living Adjustment (COLA) information
from most of the DPWs. Mr. Lawson also presented the
Commission with a revised spreadsheet showing the hourly pay rate chart with
the first two steps removed and two new steps added. The Commission agreed
unanimously, on a motion by Mrs. Chapell, seconded by Mr. Pollack, that the chart
be left as is and that two steps (11 and 12) be added to the higher end of the
chart. The Commission went on to instruct Mr. Lawson to conduct another poll
with the payroll department of each community within the district for the
purpose of comparing the Project’s rates with the DPWs.
The Commission wishes to determine if the Project’s current hourly pay rate
chart is comparable with similar positions within the DPWs.
The Commission asked Mr. Lawson to report back to them within ten months.
The
Commission then considered pay rate increases following a discussion of the
employee evaluations and based on the information provided by Mr. Lawson. The
Commission agreed unanimously on a motion by Mrs. MacEachern, seconded by Mrs.
Chapell, to advance each hourly employee one step effective July 4, 2011.
The
Commission then considered the Director and Assistant Director. The Commission conducted an evaluation and
agreed to the following:
On
a motion by Mr. Pollack, seconded by Mrs. Shea, the Commission agreed unanimously
to award a 3% salary increase to Director Smith and Assistant Director Lawson
as “top managers”.
The
Commission, upon completion of this pay rate review, agreed unanimously to
accept the Budgetary Control Report on a motion by Mrs. Chapell, seconded by
Mrs. MacEachern.
Next the Director presented
the Fieldwork Accomplished Report which covered field activities completed year
to date. The Director noted that ULV applications had commenced although
weather conditions (mainly low temperatures) had delayed these applications.
The Commission then unanimously accepted the Fieldwork Accomplished Report on a
motion by Mrs. Shea, seconded by Mrs. Chapell.
As Informational, the
Commission agreed to draft a letter to Representative Garlick
thanking her for her support during this most recent budget cycle.
The Commission also reviewed
a draft letter from the Cape Cod Mosquito Control Project regarding the
problems with the most recent budget cycle involving the Board. The Commission
noted that they agreed “in principle” with this letter and asked the Director
to keep them informed relative to this matter.
Commissioner Jacques
requested that a standing agenda item be added to the monthly agenda relative to
a review of an addendum to the annual reports which are submitted to the member
communities at the end of each calendar year.
The next regular meeting of
the Commission will be on August 11, 2011 at 4:00 P.M. in the office of the
Project.
On a motion by Mrs. Chapell
the meeting was adjourned at 5:32 P.M.
Respectfully
submitted,
Norman P. Jacques, Chairman
Commission
Meeting
May
5, 2011
The
Meeting was called to order at 4:00 P.M. in the office of the Project.
Those
present were: Norman P.
Jacques, Chairman
Maureen
P. MacEachern
Linda
R. Shea
Richard
J. Pollack
Robin
L. Chapell
The
minutes of the March 17, 2011 Commission
The
Budgetary Control Report was then reviewed by the Commission. Commissioner
Pollack began the discussion by reviewing his pending presentation before the
State Reclamation and Mosquito Control Board. Following a lengthy discussion
relative to what points Commissioner Pollack should concentrate on and a
thorough review of both the current Fiscal Year 2011 Budget and the proposed
Fiscal Year 2012 Budget, the Commission
agreed unanimously to accept the Budgetary Control report on a motion by Mrs.
Chapell, second by Mrs. Shea.
Next the Director presented
to the Commission the fieldwork accomplished. Assistant Director Lawson gave a
complete review of the recently completed aerial larval control application.
Mr. Lawson indicated that this application had the most weather related delays
that we can remember which did result in some minor decreases in acreage
treated. Mr. Lawson also indicated that preliminary review of pre/post data
from treated sites showed over a 90% control as compared to untreated sites.
Following a review of other water management activities the Commission
unanimously accepted the fieldwork accomplished report on a motion by Mrs.
MacEachern, seconded by Mrs. Chapell.
As Informational, the
Commission discussed additional ways to increase public notification and public
education relative to the various activities the Norfolk County Mosquito
Control Project provides to the residents of the member communities. On a
motion by Mrs. Chapell, seconded by Mrs. Shea, the Commission unanimously
agreed that the Director should pursue face book and tweeter as ways to expand
communication with residents in the member communities.
The next regular meeting of
the Commission will be on June 16, 2011 at 4:00 P.M. in the office of the
Project.
On a motion by Mr. Pollack,
seconded by Mrs. Chapell the meeting was adjourned on a unanimous vote at 5:05
P.M.
Respectfully
submitted,
Norman P. Jacques, Chairman
Norfolk
County Mosquito Control Project
Commission
Meeting
March
17, 2011
The
Meeting was called to order at 4:00 P.M. in the office of the Project.
Those
present were: Norman P.
Jacques, Chairman
Linda
R. Shea
Richard
J. Pollack
Robin
L. Chapell
The
minutes of the January 13, 2011 Commission
The
Commission then reviewed the Budgetary Control Report. The Director reviewed
with the Commission the final revisions to the FY2012 proposed budget which now
totals $1,638,250. The Commission then discussed the January 13th
Budget meeting and reviewed with the Director as to whether the Commission had
complied in full with the State Reclamation and Mosquito Control Boards policy
entitled “The Massachusetts Mosquito Control Budget Notification and
Compliance Policy “. The Director noted that a summary of the public
feedback was necessary to complete the compliance process and that this would
be sent before the deadline of April 15th. The Director noted that due to an
adjustment in the group insurance chargeback rate the estimated cost of this
component of the budget can be reduced by $7,775. The Commission instructed the
Director to adjust the Budget Request for F/Y2012 accordingly and resubmit to
the Board. The Commission then agreed
unanimously to accept the Budgetary Control report on a motion by Mrs. Shea and
a second by Mr. Pollack. The Commission then considered the content of a
presentation to be made by the Commission to the Board at the Boards next
regular meeting to be held on May 25, 2011 at the
Next the Commission
considered fieldwork accomplished. Due to the length of the budget review the
Commission tabled this discussion until the next meeting on a motion by Mrs.
Shea, seconded by Mrs. Chapell.
Under agenda item “As
Informational” Commissioner Pollack previewed the video conversions of the
staff presentations which were recorded by Walpole Cable TV on January 13th.
Commissioner Pollack noted that these video clips did not convert well to DVD
format but that these videos viewed in concert with the power point
presentations/PDF files (all of which will be placed on the Projects website)
will provide the public with a detailed accounting of the Projects operations
and budget. The Commission agreed that these video clips should be available
on-line and instructed the Director to upload these as soon as possible.
The next regular meeting of
the Commission will be on May 5, 2011 at 4:00 P.M. in the office of the
Project. The Commission also agreed to convene a follow-up (tentative) meeting
on May 19, 2011 if necessary.
On a motion by Mr. Pollack,
seconded by Mrs. Chapell the meeting was adjourned on a unanimous vote at 5:14
P.M.
Respectfully
submitted,
Norman P. Jacques, Chairman
Norfolk
County Mosquito Control Project
Commission
Meeting
January
13, 2011
The
Meeting was called to order at 7:00 P.M. in the main meeting room of the
Those
present were: Maureen P.
MacEachern, Chairman
Linda
R. Shea
Richard
J. Pollack
Robin
L. Chapell
Norman
P. Jacques
Caroline
Haviland, Water Management Program Coordinator
Nathaniel
Boonisar, Surveillance Technician
Channsotha
Suom, Entomologist
Elizabeth
Donnell, Administrative Assistant
Robert Martin, Westwood
Patch.com Reporter
The
minutes of the December 14, 2010, Commission
Commissioner
Shea then read an opening statement on behalf of the Commission which served as
an introduction to a prepared power point presentation by senior NCMCP staff.
This presentation was conducted in order to comply with the State Reclamation
and Mosquito Control Board Policy entitled “The Massachusetts Mosquito
Control Budget Notification and Compliance Policy”.
An
outline of this presentation follows:
Opening Statement –
"The Norfolk County Mosquito
Control Project Commission represents the interests of the member communities
and their residents by providing oversight of Project activities. The
Commissioners each live or work within a community serviced by the Project,
were nominated by municipal authorities, and were evaluated and appointed to
their posts by the State Reclamation and Mosquito Control Board. The Commission
strives to ensure that the member communities receive services consistent with
applicable laws and justified by tenets of public health, vector control,
environmental safety and fiscal responsibility. The Commission invites input
and questions from community officials and residents. The Project's website
announces the Commission's monthly meetings and planned agendas, and hosts
minutes from past meetings."
Field Operations at
What to do about mosquitoes?
•
Nothing? Historical disease and nuisance. Requests…
•
Individual approach?
•
Town approach?
•
Regional approach? “…best applied
at a regional level.”
•
Small enough to mold to town needs, and to the unique local geographic
and watershed characteristics.
•
Large enough to avoid spillover from one town to another.
•
In line with current trends to ‘regionalize’ municipal services.
Effective mosquito control requires
ü
interdisciplinary efforts
ü
best
available science.
ü
Proactive
vs. reactive response
ü
integrated pest management
Integrated
A strategy that is recognized world wide.
IPM is applied in all kinds of pest control
environments
Agricultural, structural,
public health, etc.
IPM (Integrated
Selection of biological, cultural, physical
& chemical methods to provide:
The
greatest benefit in reducing burden from a pest (damage, disease, nuisance)
The least risk to public &
environmental health, at lowest effective cost
IPM at
•
Surveillance - Know the enemy for more
effective control. Where? Why?
•
Source reduction – Remove standing water
/reduce need for insecticide treatments. Long term
control vs. more frequent applications
•
Larvicide -
More effective to control in water than after they become adults
•
Adulticide -
When other efforts don’t achieve target control levels.
Surveillance
& Outreach -
Review of Mosquito Life
Cycle
Larval Surveillance
Weather
conditions
Larvae dipper
Emergence jar
Geographic Information
Systems (GIS)
Larval historical data
Focused surveillance
Adult Surveillance
Review of Equipment used
Specimen Processing
Random sampling
Identification
Data Entry
Risk
assessment
Historical
viral activity
DPH
risk map
Lab
Submission - WNv, EEE isolation
Public Outreach
Public
outreach is another component of my duties.
Our newly improved website is the best resource for
information about our operations. We
provide such things as:
Notifications
for planned work,
Weekly reports on
surveillance and virus activity,
We have a frequently asked questions
page,
Residents can request
service online, and we provide data and analysis of our
field and lab work such as
efficacy studies as seen from the previous slide. In short, our website has all the information
a resident or visitor would want to know and if they have further questions or
comments,
They can contact us via email or phone, both of
which are available on the easy to find Contact Us tab on each page of our
website.
Since the inception of our
new website, we’ve had over 11,000 first time visitors.
In addition to an online presence, I promote our
organization and services through guest speaking,
Exhibits and presenting work at conferences where we
share ideas and information amongst fellow scientists and mosquito control
workers.
Water Management Program -Caroline E. Haviland
Water Management Project
Coordinator 12 ½ years
B.S. Biology - Environmental
Concentration
Water Management - Our
Goal is to ensure drainage systems, whether a constructed
ditch
or natural stream continue to function in a manner that prevents larval
mosquito development, referred to as
Source Reduction.
Source reduction is
the physical or permanent elimination of stagnant water that is conducive to
larval mosquito development and is a proactive component of the NCMCP’s IPM program.
Silt/Sediment (i.e. Road Sanding
Efforts), Natural and Unnatural Debris (i.e. trash, tires,
branches or trees) impeding water
flow is Removed from within an existing channel.
This Type of work serves to dewater an area before mosquito
emergence can occur and may also provide habitat for larval eating fish,
eliminating the need for larval or adult
intervention.
Complaint Sources:
Public Officials
Residents
NCMCP Field Technicians
Investigation of Documented
Breeding Sites
(40 Requests
in 2010 - Address each request, usually within 2 weeks)
Investigation:
Initial Site Visit
Inspect
channel, laterals, any associated culverts
and/or wetlands
Blockages
Blown down trees
High sediment accumulations
Dip/Collect mosquito larvae
Determine
the Level/Type of WM work
§
No Work Needed
§
Culvert Clean
§
Hand Cleaning
§
Intensive Hand/Brush
§
Mechanical WM Project
In the office Utilizing MA
GIS
Quickly Activate Data Layers and
access Integrated Databases
§
Past work History/Details
§
Access Larval and Treatment Data
§
Wetland Boundaries/Types
§
Identify any Habitat/Site issues
•
Endangered Species Habitat
•
Vernal Pools
•
Stream Types for Project Timing
Culvert Clearing:
Crews
clear obstructions up and down gradient of man-made structures
in order to prevent flooding
and restore continuous flow
•
Requires Routine Maintenance
•
Conducted during Foul Weather
Crews completed 633 total
in 2010
Routine Hand Clearing:
Simple Hand Tools &
Hard Work
In 2010 Crews checked 118,995’/22.5+
miles, cleared 36,505’ /6.9 miles
Intensive Hand/Brush Clearing:
Full Crew Projects utilizing Chain Saws, Brush
Cutters, Loppers, Rakes & at times Dump Trucks to haul away cut brush,
trash or debris to municipal Transfer Stations or Compost Yards
2010 Crews Completed 37,680’ / 7+ Miles
Beaver Management
?:
Beavers are Becoming
More Common within Charles River Watershed
Many times we’re the first
to identify a beaver issue
Currently
•
Continue to Monitor Sites
•
Offer information to Residents
•
Offer assistance to Boards of Health and Con Coms
Mechanical Excavation Work:
Work Sites which require excavation to remove
impeding sediment/debris in order to restore or maintain proper drainage
and eliminate stagnant water
On average we complete 8 Projects
per year
2010 completed 10 WM projects, 4 conducted during
low-flow 9,545’ / 1.9 Miles
Conducted in compliance with
state BMPs as well as federal and state law
The Process after
determining Excavation is necessary
Following additional Site Work
Notification & Landowner
Permission
Notification to USACE (United States Army Corps of
Engineers)
Notification to Regional DEP Office
Notification to Municipal Conservation Commission
If site determined to fall within Priority Habitat
for Rare Species
Follow established NHESP
Guidelines and notify if applicable
Procure Landowner Permission
Send Notifications
Additional Site Visits may be requested and
performed
Planning & Site
Preparation
Prior to Notification
§
Channel Measurements (+Profile)
§
Plan spoil disposal
§
Soil Evaluations (mineral/organic)
§
Plan Access/Egress
§
Project Timing
•
Perennial/Intermittent Stream? Low flow?
•
Frozen Ground/Vegetation Die Back
Snow Cover for lawn
protection
Post Site
with NCMCP Sign
Create a Photographic
Record and
Map of photographic points
Flag Work Site (White Flag
every 100’)
Contact Dig Safe
Process Ticket minimum 3
days prior
Receive Clear to Dig
Date/Start Time
Check for Utility Markings
30 days post notification
Transport Equipment to Site
Excavation Equipment
We utilize Wide-Tracked, Low Ground Pressure Equipment minimizes
wetland/site impact
Excavators Switched to
Chevron Clarity® Hydraulic Oil
inherently BIODEGRADABLE passes the EPA's
acute aquatic toxicity (LC-50) test zinc-free and formulated to meet or exceed
the performance requirements of conventional anti-wear fluids (better for
colder weather conditions)
Link Belt 1600 Excavator
•
•
Very maneuverable
Kobelco SK60 Excavator
•
Specialized Tracks
•
Lowest Psi
•
Salt marsh
•
Fresh Water Sites
John Deere Bull Dozer
•
Grading
•
vegetation management
Excavation and Completion
•
Minimize cutting of brush for access
•
Maneuver around trees
•
Retain vegetated Banks and/or Vegetated Buffer Strips if feasible
•
Retain or reconnect channel to adjacent Flood Plain
•
Remove excavate Off Site or within adjacent Upland Areas
whenever possible
•
Seed exposed banks to Stabilize/Prevent Erosion
•
Use straw as a seed cover, free of invasive species
Upon completion of any Mechanical WM Project Site is
monitored for approximately 2 years
•
Scheduled and Rain Event Site Visits
•
Maintain a Photographic Record of
each Mechanical WM Project Site
Our 5 Member Field Crew Performs all of the
field work for the project throughout the ENTIRE year
WINTER
•
Investigate, Plan & Perform WM Projects
•
Post Frost INT & Routine Hand Clearing
•
Culvert Clearing
•
Equipment/Building Maintenance
•
Site Monitoring/Photography
•
GIS Mapping/Databasing
SPRING
•
Investigate, Plan & Perform Mechanical and Hand WM Projects
•
Larval Data Collections & ground applications
•
Summer
•
Investigate &Plan WM Projects
•
•
Perform Low-Flow WM Projects
•
Site Monitoring
Fall
•
Investigate, Plan & Perform all WM Projects
•
Complete Low-Flow Projects by Oct. 1st
•
GIS Mapping/Databasing
•
Aerial Photography
•
Site Monitoring
There is NO “Down Time” at the NCMCP
Larviciding –
A larvicide is any method
or product designed to kill larvae or prevent larvae from becoming adults.
More efficient to control as larvae than to try and
control as adults.
Aerial Larvicide 11,000 –
14,000 acres each spring, periodic summer applications.
Applied by helicopter
Ground Larvicide
Applied by hand to wetlands, rain basins, and other
man-made water sources
Three larvicide products
currently in use at NCMCP
Bti (Bacillus thuringiensis var. israelensis)
BS (Bacillus sphaericus)
Methoprene
All three
products are Biorational products, meaning the
product is of a biological origin and provides effective mosquito control with
limited or no impact on the environment and beneficial organisms.
Adulticide –
Spraying” “Fogging” = Ultra Low Volume (ULV) aerosol
Active ingredient - Sumithrin
Synthetic pyrethroid – man made version of natural pyrethrin, found in chrysanthemum.
Applied
from truck mounted equipment
Applied from 2am – sunrise.
½ ounce of product per acre
of coverage.
Product breaks down in
sunlight quickly.
Very low toxicity to people
and environment.
Response to high nuisance
populations and to knock down disease carrying mosquitoes.
GIS (Geographic Information Systems)
Used in all aspects of our
operations but primarily in conducting aerial larvicide
applications, tracking ULV applications, and documenting water management
projects.
Use
of Geographic Information Systems (GIS) at the NCMCP
What
is GIS?
Geographic Information Systems
- A computerized form of mapping that combines geographical and statistical
data about a theme.
Why
do we use GIS?
Can store massive amounts of data that can be
shared with the public
Can
view different types of data according to one’s needs
Saves
time and money, provides greater transparency
NCMCP
GIS
Started using ArcView GIS
in 2001 primarily to simplify Spring Aerial Larvicide
Has
expanded to nearly every aspect of our program
Continuing
to discover new uses
State
(MassGIS) provides a vast array of GIS map/data
layers
GIS
at NCMCP
Aerial Larvicide
Ultra Low Volume (ULV) Applications
Aerial
Larvicide –
Draw onto topographic maps
Planimeter to estimate acreage
Write
larval data onto map
Aerial Larvicide – GIS – New Way
Shapefiles can be
converted to AgNav aircraft navigation system.
AgNav flight data can be converted back to shapefiles
Show
coverage of actual swath width as well as acreage calculations
Share data with the
public
Continuing
to make improvements on data maps
Eliminating
or re-sizing wetlands that don’t breed or lack standing water
Improving
efficacy within and along edges of wetlands
ULV Adult Control Applications – GIS
Request
locations are mapped.
A record of request calls
as well as ULV route can be stored for use year after
year
Visually seeing the
request locations can help identify problem areas that may be
treatable with larviciding
or water management
GPS
tracking data can be integrated into our GIS software
Potential
problem areas can be identified and investigated for larviciding,
water
management, or targeted ULV Treatment
Maps
are created showing our scheduled
Maps
are posted on our website each day.
Trucks
are equipped with a GPS navigation System that is integrated with the
ULV
Application Equipment and our in-house computers
GPS tracking data is compatible with our GIS
software and can provide important information about the application. Information can be stored and shared with the
public.
A Review of the State
Reclamation and Mosquito Control, Board policy entitled “The Massachusetts
Mosquito Control Budget Notification and Compliance Policy”, Comparison of The
Fiscal Year Budgets FY2010, FY2011 and proposed Budget FY 2012.
The Policy:
The State Reclamation & Mosquito Control Board, in
making its certification and approval of Districts Budgets requires that each
District:
Invite the public to a meeting to be held on or
before March 1 - present preliminary proposed budget and work plans
Send
invitation and preliminary proposed budget to the Chief Administrative Officer,
the Chief Executive Officer and to the Finance Committee
Make available the District preliminary budget to local
public officials and citizens
Send a report including summary of public comments
along with the final District budget proposed to the Board by April 15th.
Publish and mail Form SRB‐1 and complete and return Form SRB‐2 to the board
Budget
Review presentation divided into three sections:
Breakdown
of the F/Y 2010 Budget (last completed budget)
Comparison of the F/Y 2010 Budget with the Projected
FY 2011 (Current Budget) and the FY2012 (Proposed Budget)
Review of the Cherry Sheet
Assessments
FOR THE BUDGET REVIEW PLEASE REFERENCE THE WORD
DOCUMENT ENTITLED:
Norfolk County Mosquito
Control Budget Review as presented at the January 13, 2011 Public Budget
meeting,
Note - This document will be
attached to the minutes and a copy of this entire presentation including the
budget review can be found at the Projects web site:
http://www.massnrc.org/ncmcp/Research/Research.htm
Salary Structure:
Grade
1 Grade
10
Field
Technician $17.55
($36,733) $22.89 ($47,611)
Field
Tech Supervisor $20.66
($42,973) $26.95 ($56,056)
Tractor
Operator $20.15
($41,912) $26.29 ($54,683)
Water
Management
Project Coordinator $25.19 ($52,395) $32.88
($68,390)
Surveillance
Technician $23.34 ($48,547) $30.45 ($63,336)
Entomologist $23.83 ($49,566) $31.10 ($64,688)
Administrative
Clerk $16.01 ($33,301) $20.89 ($43,451)
Assistant
Director $35.64 ($74,131)
Director $44.64 ($92,851)
Cherry
Sheet Assessment Review:
Department of Revenue Cherry Sheet Assessment is
based on a formula legislatively established.
The Formula takes into account both a communities equalized evaluation and land area (square
miles) to produce percentages for each Community.
Once the State Reclamation & Mosquito Control
Board “certifies” the Projects budget the Department of Revenue then applies
these percentages to establish the cherry sheet assessment for each community
Fiscal Year 2011 Cherry
Sheet Assessments:
Community District Assessment
Foxborough 59,464
Holbrook 26,085
Medfield 49,061
Medway 37,421
Millis 29,020
Westwood 53,771
Wrentham 50,989
Total 1,458,460
Note:
1.48 percent of each
assessment provides funding for the State Reclamation and Mosquito Control
Board.
As
a final presentation note the Director thanked the staff for their extra
efforts putting together this informative presentation.
The next regular meeting of
the Commission will be on March 17, 2011 at 4:00 P.M. in the office of the
Project.
At 8:10 P.M. the
Respectfully
submitted,
Norman P. Jacques, Chairman
Norfolk
County Mosquito Control Budget Review as presented at the January 13, 2011
Public Budget meeting, 










Commission
Meeting
December
14, 2010
The
Meeting was called to order at 8:30 A.M. in the office of the Project.
Those
present were: Maureen P.
MacEachern, Chairman
Linda
R. Shea
Richard
J. Pollack
Robin
L. Chapell
Norman
P. Jacques
Caroline
Haviland, Water Management Program Coordinator
Nathaniel
Boonisar, Surveillance Technician
Channsotha
Suom, Entomologist
Elizabeth
Donnell, Administrative Assistant
Christina Gleason,
The
minutes of the November 9, 2010, Commission
The
Commission then reviewed the Budgetary Control Report. The Director reviewed
with the Commission the final revisions to the FY2012 proposed budget which now
totals $1,638,250. The Director noted that this budget has been submitted to
the State Reclamation and Mosquito Control Board for their review and
forwarding to the Department of Revenue for their use in establishing the
preliminary FY 2012 cherry sheet assessments. The Director explained that these
revisions were necessary due to a miscalculation of the fringe benefit costs on
the states spending plan spreadsheet. The Director indicated that it appears
that the state spreadsheet does not remove the calculation for the state
retirement system which project employees do not belong to.
The
Director then indicated that each of the senior staff had prepared their
revised power point presentation for the upcoming SRMCB policy mandated public
budget meeting. Commissioner Shea first presented her suggestions on open
comments. At this point the following employees presented:
Caroline Haviland – Water Management Operations
Channsotha Suom – Mosquito Surveillance and Public
Relations
Nathaniel Boonisar – GIS Mapping, Data maintenance
and GPS tracking systems
The Commission once again
provided feedback for each presentation. Following a brief review of other
budgetary matters the Commission agreed unanimously to accept the Budgetary
Control report on a motion by Mrs. Shea and a second by Mr. Jacques.
Next the Commission reviewed
the Fieldwork Accomplished report. The main focus of field operations this time
of year continues to be on water management. The Fieldwork Accomplished Report
was unanimously accepted on a motion by Mrs. Shea, seconded by Mrs. Chapell.
The Commission then voted to
elect new officers for 2011. On a motion by Mrs. Shea, seconded by Mr. Pollack,
the Commission unanimously elected Mr. Jacques as Chairman and Mrs. Chapell as
Vice Chairman.
Under agenda item “As
Informational” the Commission received comments from Christina Gleason a
resident of
The next regular meeting of
the Commission will be on January 12, 2011 at 7:00 P.M. in the
The Commission agreed to hold
their next meeting (following the January meeting) on Thursday, March 17,
2011.
At 10:23 A.M. the
Respectfully
submitted,
Maureen P. MacEachern, Chairman
Norfolk
County Mosquito Control Project
Commission
Meeting
November
9, 2010
The
Meeting was called to order at 4:00 P.M. in the office of the Project.
Those
present were: Maureen P. MacEachern,
Chairman
Linda
R. Shea
Richard
J. Pollack
Robin
L. Chapell
Caroline
Haviland, Water Management Program Coordinator
Nathaniel
Boonisar, Surveillance Technician
Channsotha
Suom, Entomologist
Elizabeth
Donnell, Administrative Assistant
The
minutes of the October 21, 2010, Commission
The
Commission then reviewed the Budgetary Control Report. The Director indicated
that each of the senior staff had prepared a preliminary power point
presentation for the upcoming SRMCB policy mandated public budget meeting. At
this point the following employees presented:
Caroline Haviland – Water Management Operations
Channsotha Suom – Mosquito Surveillance and Public
Relations
Nathaniel Boonisar – GIS Mapping, Data maintenance
and GPS tracking systems
The Commission provided
feedback for each presentation and agreed that final presentations should be
made at their next regular meeting in December. Following a brief review of other
budgetary matters the Commission agreed unanimously to accept the Budgetary
Control report on a motion by Mrs. Shea and a second by Mr. Pollack.
As a last agenda item the
Commission reviewed the Fieldwork Accomplished report. The main focus of field
operations this time of year is water management. Upon completion of a review
of these operations, the Commission unanimously accepted the Fieldwork
Accomplished Report on a motion by Mr. Pollack, seconded by Mrs. Shea.
The Commission agreed to
elect the new Commission Officers at the conclusion of the December 14, 2011
meeting.
At 10:08 A.M. the
Respectfully
submitted,
Maureen P. MacEachern,
Chairman
Commission
Meeting
October
21, 2010
The
Meeting was called to order at 4:00 P.M. in the office of the Project.
Those
present were: Maureen
P. MacEachern, Chairman
Linda
R. Shea
Richard J. Pollack
Norman
P. Jacques
The
minutes of the September 8, 2010, Commission
The
Commission next reviewed the Budgetary Control Report. As part of this report
the Director presented to the Commission an outline for the upcoming Budget/Work Plan meeting to be held on
January 12, 2011 at 7:00 P.M. at the
As
a final agenda item the Commission reviewed the Fieldwork Accomplished report.
The Director noted that the main focus of daily operations is water management.
The Assistant Director briefed the Commission on some of the work which has
been completed by field personnel using both excavators and hand tools. The Commission then unanimously accepted the
Fieldwork Accomplished Report on a motion by Mrs. Shea, seconded by Mr.
Jacques.
At
4:57 P.M. the
Respectfully submitted,
Maureen P. MacEachern, Chairman
Commission
Meeting
The
Meeting was called to order at
Those
present were: Maureen
P. MacEachern, Chairman
Robin
L. Chapell
Linda
R. Shea
Richard
J. Pollack
Norman
P. Jacques
The
minutes of the
The
Commission then considered the Budgetary Control Report as presented by the
Director. The Commission entered into a lengthy discussion with the Director
and Assistant Director relative to preparations for a public meeting as
mandated by the State Reclamation and Mosquito Control Board’s policy entitled
“The Massachusetts Mosquito Control
Budget Notification and Compliance Certification Policy”. The Director noted
that the policy required the Commission to hold a public meeting before
The Chief Administrative Officer
The Chief Executive Office
The Finance Committee
The Director informed the Commission that this budget meeting must present the following information:
Districts preliminary proposed budget (FY 2012) with two previous years
Work plans for the upcoming mosquito season
Finally, the Director noted that additional budgetary information had to be made available upon request and that the Commission was required to submit compliance forms to the Board once the meeting had taken place. The Commission then discussed, in great detail, what information and in what format these requirements should be met. The Commission agreed upon the following date, time and location subject to Commissioner Chapell’s securing of the room.
Date – January 12, 2011 (snow date January
13, 2011)
Time – 7:00 P.M.
Location –
On a unanimous vote the Commission accepted the Budgetary
Control report following a motion by Mr. Pollack and a second by Mrs. Shea. The
Commission requested that the Director have available for the next meeting an
outline reflecting the format of the presentation which will be used for this
public meeting. The Commission further requested that the Director inform
senior staff to be prepared to provide their preliminary work plan
presentations at the November and December meetings of the Commission.
Next
the Commission reviewed the Fieldwork Accomplished Report as prepared by the
Assistant Director. Mr. Lawson noted that all ULV applications would be
suspended as of
The
Commission then agreed on the following schedule of monthly meetings:
At
Respectfully submitted,
Maureen P. MacEachern, Chairman
Commission
Meeting
The
Meeting was called to order at
Those
present were: Maureen P. MacEachern, Chairman
Robin
L. Chapell
Linda
R. Shea
Richard
J. Pollack
Norman
P. Jacques
The
minutes of the
The
Commission then reviewed the Budgetary Control Report which included a
preliminary review of the F/Y 2012 proposed budget. The Commission reviewed
with the Director the status of the vehicle fleet. The Director noted that
several of the pick up trucks used as ULV sprayer mounts have reach 100,000
miles and are becoming costly to maintain. The Director noted that these
vehicles would need to be replaced in the next year or so. The Commission
discussed the various options available such as out right purchase versus a
lease/purchase option. The Commission modified the Director’s original budget
request to accommodate the replacement of two of these pick up trucks. The
Commission expressed concern that the recent string of multi- year level funded
budgets was beginning to erode the Projects services especially the aerial
larval control operations. The Director noted that it would be very difficult
to fiscally sustain both a spring and, if needed, a summer aerial larval
control application as each operation cost approximately $150,000 to
$200,000. The Commission then
unanimously accepted the Budgetary Control Report on a motion by Mr. Jacques, seconded
by Mr. Pollack. The Commission suggested that the Director place on the next
regular meeting agenda the State
Reclamation and Mosquito Control Board’s
The
Fieldwork Accomplished Report was the next agenda item reviewed by the
Commission. As part of this report,
the Director briefed the Commission relative to the current arbovirus
surveillance data. The Director noted that to-date there has been no virus
isolates in mosquitoes collected in the Project’s service area. The Director
went on to note that most “human biting” mosquito species are at low levels in
trap collections. As the report indicated, the main focus of the field
operations has been ULV applications, rain basin treatments and sporadic ground
larval control applications. The Water Management Specialist has been able to
squeeze in a number of water management projects this summer as is also
reflected in the report. The Commission unanimously accepted the Fieldwork
Accomplished Report on a motion by Mrs. Chapell, seconded by Mrs. Shea.
The
Commission changed the next regular meeting of the Commission which will now be
held on Wednesday, September 8, 2010 at 8:30 a.m. in the office of the Project.
At
Respectfully submitted,
Maureen P. MacEachern, Chairman
Commission
Meeting
July
15, 2010
The
Meeting was called to order at 4:00 P.M. in the office of the Project.
Those
present were: Maureen
P. MacEachern, Chairman
Robin
L. Chapell
Linda
R. Shea
Norman
P. Jacques
The
minutes of the
Next
the Commission reviewed the Budgetary Control Report which included a
preliminary review of F/Y 2010 total expenditures and an estimate of the
rollover amount into F/Y 2011. The Director noted that this was an estimate
only and that there could be additional Group Insurance charges as well as
miscellaneous unemployment/Medicare change backs. The Director then briefed the
Commission on the status of the F/Y 2011 spending plan which will be submitted
to the State Reclamation and Mosquito Control Board in the near future. The
Director then request guidance from the Commission relative to the F/Y 2012
Budget request. The Commission instructed the Director to approach this budget
request by identifying the Projects
basic funding requirements. The Director noted that the deadline for submission
of the first F/Y 2012 Budget proposal would be the end of August. The
Commission then unanimously accepted the Budgetary Control Report on a motion
by Mr. Jacques, seconded by Mrs. Chapell.
The
Fieldwork Accomplished Report was then reviewed by the Commission. As part of
this report, the Director briefed the
Commission relative to the current arbovirus
surveillance data. The Director also provided a review of the current mosquito
populations by species. The report indicated that the main focus of the field
operations was ULV applications, rain basin treatments and sporadic ground
larval control applications. The Director then presented the Commission two
reports on recent water management projects. These reports were prepared by
The
next regular meeting of the Commission will be on Thursday, August 12, 2010.
The Commission also set the September meeting for Thursday, September 9, 2010
both meetings will convene at 4:00 P.M.
At
4:47 P.M. the
Respectfully submitted,
Maureen
P. MacEachern, Chairman
Commission
Meeting July 1, 2010
The
Meeting was called to order at 8:30 A.M. in the office of the Project.
Those
present were: Maureen
P. MacEachern, Chairman
Robin
L. Chapell
Linda
R. Shea
Richard
J. Pollack
Norman
P. Jacques
The
minutes of the June 23, 2010 Commission
The
Commission then reviewed with the Director the Department of Public Health
recently issued EEE Risk map which indicted Walpole as a “moderate risk” area.
This designation is in response to the late season identification of a cow
infected with the EEE virus in October of 2009. The Director discussed the
possibility of locating additional mosquito traps in the vicinity of this 2009
case. Commissioner Chapell noted that she would contact the property owner to
inform them of this additional trapping. The Commission also reviewed the risk
map for West Nile virus which showed all of
The
Commission had already agreed to hold their next regular meeting on Thursday,
July 15, 2010 in the office of the Project at 4:00 P.M.
At
9:00 A.M. the
Respectfully submitted,
Maureen P. MacEachern, Chairman
Commission
Meeting
June 23, 2010
The
Meeting was called to order at
Those
present were: Maureen
P. MacEachern, Chairman
Robin
L. Chapell
Linda
R. Shea
Richard
J. Pollack
Norman
P. Jacques
The
minutes of the May 26, 2010 Commission
The
Commission then reviewed the Budgetary Control Report. The Director then
presented to the Commission a set of documents prepared by the Assistant
Director after extensive interviews with the Directors of Public Works at each
of the member communities relative to pay rate step increases and COLA adjustments.
The Director expressed to the Commission the excellent job done by the
Assistant Director who was able to interview all but one of the DPW Directors.
The Commission noted once again that they felt that the projects personnel
profile and community function more closely resembled the DPW personnel profile
than any other municipal or state agency. Following an extensive review of
these documents, as well as a follow up review of the board of health pay rate
reviews conducted prior to the last commission meeting, the Commission took the
following action:
On a
motion by Commissioner
They
also took the following action:
On a
motion by Commissioner Norman Jacques, seconded by Commissioner
“The
Commission appreciates your fiscal responsibility, your dedication, the long
hours you work and your professionalism.”
The
Budgetary Control Report was then unanimously accepted on a motion by Mrs.
Shea, seconded by Mr. Jacques.
Next
the Commission considered the Fieldwork Accomplished Report. The Director then
reviewed with the Commission the following documents:
a.
GEIR Update and Certificate
of the Secretary of
Energy and Environmental Affairs.
b.
National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit.
The Director covered the major items detailed
in each document and discussed with the Commission the potential impacts to the
Projects various control strategies and surveillance system. The Director
indicated that there was a public comment period continuing for 45 days. The
Commission agreed to continue to analyze these documents and to consider
collaboration with other mosquito control districts and/or the State
Reclamation and Mosquito Control Board as to how best to pursue the NPDES
permit once the final draft was issued in December. The Commission agreed with
the Director’s suggestion that he should convene a meeting with the other
mosquito control district Directors to help facilitate this collaboration.
Following a brief discussion of work accomplished since the last Commission
meeting, the Commission unanimously accepted the Fieldwork Accomplished Report,
on a motion by Mrs. Chapell, seconded by Mrs. Shea.
The
Commission agreed to hold their next regular meeting on Thursday, July 15, 2010
in the office of the Project at 4:00 P.M.
At
5:00 P.M. the
Respectfully submitted,
Maureen P. MacEachern, Chairman
Commission
Meeting
May
26, 2010
The
Meeting was called to order at
Those
present were: Maureen
P. MacEachern, Chairman
Robin
L. Chapell
Linda
R. Shea
Richard
J. Pollack
Norman
P. Jacques
The
minutes of the April 14, 2010 Commission
The
Commission then reviewed the Budgetary Control Report. The Director presented
to the Commission a spreadsheet review of remaining expenditures for FY2010.
The Director noted that there would be a potential rollover of funds from
FY2010 to FY 2011 of approximately 3.7% or around $55,000. The Director went on
to note that it was difficult to estimate final Group Insurance Charges but
that if they were higher than estimated the rollover amount would cover this.
The Commission then reviewed the current pay rate chart for hourly employees.
The Director presented to the Commission a chart which incorporated responses
from the member communities. This chart was prepared by Elizabeth Donnell, the
Administrative Assistant, following a canvassing of the boards of health in
each member community. Following a lengthy discussion relative to COLA and step
increases awarded by member communities the Commission decided to table any
further action on pay rates until the next regular meeting of the Commission.
The Commission requested that the Director canvas the departments of public
works in each member community for the purpose of further clarifying step rate
increase with in the member communities. The Commission instructed the Director
to place this on the agenda for the next regular meeting. The Budgetary Control
Report was then unanimously accepted on a motion by Mr. Jacques, seconded by
Mr. Pollack.
The
Director then reviewed with the Commission a spreadsheet analysis of fieldwork
accomplished year to date. The Assistant Director briefed the Commission
relative to the recently completed aerial spring larval control application.
The Assistant Director, as part of this review, described a swath width study
conducted by office staff
headed by himself and the project’s entomologist
Under
new business Commissioner Pollack briefed the Commission on two items. First
Commissioner Pollack noted that the GEIR update had been accepted by the
Secretary of Energy and Environmental Affairs and that his certificate has been
issued. Secondly Commissioner Pollack briefed the Commission relative to a
meeting he was invited to attend in
The
Commission agreed to hold their next meeting on Wednesday, June 23, 2010 in the
office of the Project at 4:00 P.M.
At
5:31 P.M. the
Respectfully submitted,
Maureen P. MacEachern, Chairman
Commission
Meeting
April
14, 2010
The
Meeting was called to order at
Those
present were: Maureen
P. MacEachern, Chairman
Robin
L. Chapell
Linda
R. Shea
The
minutes of the March 15, 2010 Commission
Next
the Commission reviewed the Budgetary Control Report as presented by the
Director. The Director brief the Commission on a proposal to purchase a truck
mounted mistblower to be used for barrier applications
of municipal properties. The Commission unanimously agreed, as part of the
Budgetary Control Report, to allow the Director to spend up to $10,000 for this
mistblower. The Budgetary Control Report was then
unanimously accepted on a motion by Mrs. Chapell, seconded by Mrs. Shea.
The
Director then reviewed with the Commission the Fieldwork Accomplished Report.
The Director noted that the aerial spring larval control program was on-going.
The Director brief the Commission on surveillance activity preceding this
application and that there was heavy floodplain acreage involved which would
expand the acreage treated. The Director also noted that due to the warm March
the application had been scheduled a week earlier this year due to the advanced
development of the larvae. The Commission then noted for the record that they
were impressed with the new website format and wished to thank the office staff
for their efforts especially
The
Commission agreed to hold their next meeting on Wednesday, May 26, 2010 in the
office of the Project at 4:00 P.M.
At
5:13 P.M. the
Respectfully submitted,
Maureen
P. MacEachern, Chairman
Norfolk
County Mosquito Control Project
Commission
Meeting
March
15, 2010
The
Meeting was called to order at
Those
present were: Maureen
P. MacEachern, Chairman
Norman
P. Jacques
Robin
L. Chapell
Richard
J. Pollack
Linda
R. Shea
The
minutes of the February 25, 2010 Commission
The
Commission then considered the Budgetary Control Report. The Commission
reviewed with the Director the State Reclamation and Mosquito Control Board
(SRMCB) policy on holding an annual "proposed budget
The
Fieldwork Accomplished Report was next on the agenda. The Director reviewed
with the Commission a year to date spreadsheet analysis of work accomplished
which focused on equipment maintenance and water management. The Assistant
Director noted that there were brief periods during January and February when
field work was not practical and personnel were assigned vehicle and equipment
maintenance projects. The Director informed the Commission that the need for
this maintenance has increased due to the retirement of the Project’s mechanic.
The Commission unanimously accepted the Fieldwork Accomplished Report, on a
motion by Mrs. Chapell, seconded by Mrs. Shea.
As
a final note the Commission discussed the new design for the Project’s website.
The Commission discussed at length a question and answer link for the new
website which would cover areas not regularly covered by media outlets as well
as those areas where the office received the most requests for information from
the general public. The Commission agreed to work with the Director to prepare
these questions and answers.
The
Commission will hold their next meeting on Wednesday, April 14, 2010, as
previously agreed upon, in the office of the Project at 4:00 P.M.
At
5:05 P.M. the
Respectfully submitted,
Maureen P. MacEachern, Chairman
Commission
Meeting
The
Meeting was called to order at
Those
present were: Maureen
P. MacEachern, Chairman
Norman
P. Jacques
Robin
L. Chapell
Richard
J. Pollack
Linda
R. Shea
The
minutes of the
The
first item on the agenda was the Budgetary Control Report. The Commission
reviewed with the Director the draft State Reclamation and Mosquito Control
Board (SRMCB) policy on holding an annual "proposed budget
Next
the Commission considered the Fieldwork Accomplished Report. The Assistant
Director presented to the Commission a graphical analysis of the fieldwork
accomplished data over the last fourteen years. Following a review of this data
and consideration of further, more in depth, reviews of each fieldwork strategy
by senior staff, the Commission unanimously accepted the Fieldwork Accomplished
Report, on a motion by Mrs. MacEachern, seconded by Mr. Pollack.
As
a final note the Commission elected the new Commission officers for this year.
On a motion by Mrs. Chapell, seconded by Mrs. Shea, the Commission unanimously
elected Mrs. MacEachern as the Chairman and Mr. Jacques as the Vice Chairman.
The
Commission agreed to hold their next two regular
At
Respectfully submitted,
Maureen P. MacEachern, Chairman
Commission
Meeting
December
17, 2009
The
Meeting was called to order at 4:00 P.M. in the office of the Project.
Those
present were: Linda
R. Shea, Chairman
Maureen
P. MacEachern
Robin
L. Chapell
Richard
J. Pollack
Norman
P. Jacques
John
J. Smith, Director
The
minutes of the October 22, 2009 Commission meeting were unanimously accepted on
a motion by Mr. Pollack, seconded by Mrs. Chapell.
The
Commission then considered the Budgetary Control Report as presented by the
Director. The Director reviewed with the Commission all major expenditures
incurred by the Project through the first half of Fiscal Year 2010. The
Commission then unanimously accepted the Budgetary Control Report as presented,
on a motion by Mrs. Chapell, seconded by Mr. Pollack.
The
Fieldwork Accomplished Report was then presented to the Commission. Following a
brief review of ongoing water management activities, the Commission unanimously
accepted the Fieldwork Accomplished Report, on a motion by Mr. Jacques,
seconded by Mr. MacEachern.
The
Commission then entered into a lengthy discussion relative to the GEIR update.
Commissioner Pollack and the Director briefed the Commission on an exchange of
emails between the mosquito control districts and Dr. Sam Telford (contractor
for the GEIR update) concerning surveillance protocols. Dr. Telford had
indicated that certain stakeholders were pushing for more elaborate
surveillance protocols to be incorporated into the GEIR update for the purpose
of further demonstrating adulticide and larvicide efficacy. Although no action was taken by the
Commission, they agreed to continue to monitor this issue and to consider
further formal comments at a future meeting of the Commission.
The
Director went on to brief the Commission on the high lights of the recent
Northeastern Mosquito Control Association Annual Meeting held in
As
informational, Commissioner Pollack reviewed with the Commission a recent
legislative hearing on House Bill H704 which amends the make up of the current
SRMCB board. Commissioner Pollack noted that it was unclear as to whether this
bill would advance out of the Joint Committee on Environmental, Natural
Resources and Agriculture.
The
Commission agreed to hold their next regular meeting on Thursday, February 25,
2010 in the office of the Project at 4:00 P.M.
At
5:04 P.M. the meeting was adjourned on a motion by Mr. Jacques.
Respectfully submitted,
Linda
R. Shea, Chairman
Commission
Meeting
October
22, 2009
The
Meeting was called to order at 4:00 P.M. in the office of the Project.
Those
present were: Linda
R. Shea, Chairman
Maureen
P. MacEachern
Robin
L. Chapell
Richard
J. Pollack
Norman
P. Jacques
John
J. Smith, Director
The
minutes of the September 17, 2009 Commission meeting were unanimously accepted
on a motion by Mrs. MacEachern, seconded by Mr. Jacques.
The
Commission then reviewed the Budgetary Control Report. The Director informed
the Commission of a request from the State Reclamation and Mosquito Control
Board to review the Commissions F/Y 2011 budget request as detailed in the
spending plan. Following a discussion relative to estimated expenses and
justifications to support this budget request, the Commission unanimously
agreed, on a motion by Mrs. Chapell, seconded by Mr. Jacques, to let stand the
original budget request as detailed in the spending plan. The Commission
instructed the Director to so inform the Program Manager as to their decision.
Next under the budget review the Commission considered employee/commission
attendance of the upcoming Northeastern Mosquito Control Association meeting to
be held in
The
Fieldwork Accomplished Report was then presented to the Commission. The
Director noted that all fieldwork activities have shifted back to water
management projects and that the acreage/count totals noted in this report for
all “in season” mosquito applications would be the totals for the year. As part
of the fieldwork report the Director reviewed with the Commission the results
of the Projects mosquito surveillance as well as the data collected by the
Department of Public Health. The Commission discussed at length the
ramifications of the department’s identification of an EEE infected cow in the
Town of
As
informational, the Commission asked the Director to send a request for an
“organizational chart” to the Program Manager of the State Reclamation and
Mosquito Control Board in light of the recent change to the make up of the
board and the establishment of an “Executive Director”. The Commission makes
this request so the Commission will know who to interact with on various issues
as they arise.
The
Commission agreed that their next regular meeting will be held on Thursday,
December 17, 2009 in the office of the Project at 4:00 P.M.
At
5:03 P.M. the meeting was adjourned on a motion by Mr. Jacques.
Respectfully submitted,
Linda
R. Shea, Chairman
Commission
Meeting
September
17, 2009
The
Meeting was called to order at 4:00 P.M. in the office of the Project.
Those
present were: Linda
R. Shea, Chairman
Maureen
P. MacEachern
Robin
L. Chapell
Richard
J. Pollack
Norman
P. Jacques
John
J. Smith, Director
The
minutes of the August 27, 2009 Commission meeting were unanimously accepted on
a motion by Mr. Pollack, seconded by Mrs. MacEachern.
Next
the Commission reviewed the Budgetary Control Report. The Director noted that
the F/Y 2010 Spending Plan, which included an F/Y 2011 & F/Y 2012 Budget
Estimate, had been submitted to the State Reclamation and Mosquito Control
Board as request. The Commission then unanimously accepted the Budgetary
Control Report as presented, on a motion by Mr. Jacques, seconded by Mrs.
Chapell.
The
Fieldwork Accomplished Report was then presented to the Commission. The
Director noted that all ULV activities had been discontinued on September 11th
due to unfavorable weather conditions and low trap counts. The Director went on
to inform the Commission that recent tropical rains did not result in flooding
significant enough, based on field observations, to warrant an aerial larval
control operation. Commissioner Jacques requested that the Director include
previous year’s totals on the presented spreadsheet under the various
categories of fieldwork accomplished. The Director noted that a more complete
review of fieldwork over multiple years will be presented to the Commission at
the end of the calendar years as has been done in the past. Following a review
of mosquito surveillance and virus activity to date, the Commission unanimously
accepted the Fieldwork Accomplished Report on a motion by Mrs. MacEachern,
seconded by Mr. Jacques.
As
informational, Commissioner Pollack briefed the Commission relative to a
potential application for a grant to study the ecology of Culiseta melanura and its associated habitat, the
Atlantic White Cedar Swamp. Commissioner Pollack noted that this issue was
“under discussion” with several interested parties. Commissioner Pollack noted
that there might be an opportunity for mosquito control districts, in the
Commonwealth, to be involved in this effort.
The
Commission reconfirmed that their next regular meeting will be held on
Thursday, October 22, 2009 in the office of the Project at 4:00 P.M.
At
4:55 P.M. the meeting was adjourned on a motion by Mrs. Chapell.
Respectfully submitted,
Linda
R. Shea, Chairman
Commission
Meeting
August
27, 2009
The
Meeting was called to order at 4:00 P.M. in the office of the Project.
Those
present were: Linda
R. Shea, Chairman
Maureen
P. MacEachern
Robin
L. Chapell
Richard
J. Pollack
Norman
P. Jacques
John
J. Smith, Director
The
minutes of the July 16, 2009 Commission meeting were unanimously accepted on a
motion by Mrs. Chapell, seconded by Mr. Pollack.
The
Director then presented the Budgetary Control Report to the Commission. As part
of this report the Director reviewed the F/Y 2010 Spending Plan which included
an F/Y 2011 Budget Estimate. The Commission agreed that the Director should
submit this spending plan with an estimated F/Y 2011 budget reflecting a 2.5%
increase. The Commission felt that, if necessary, and depending upon the
economic situation next year, that this budget request could be modified before
final certification by the State Reclamation and Mosquito Control Board. The
Commission also reviewed the final figures tallied following the poll of member
communities relative to COLAs/Step Increases granted to their employees.
Following a brief review of all expenses incurred and a review of estimated
rollover funds from F/Y 2009 to F/Y 2010, the Commission unanimously accepted
the Budgetary Control Report on a motion by Mrs. Chapell, seconded by Mr.
Jacques.
The
Commission then reviewed the Fieldwork Accomplished Report which included a
review of all mosquito surveillance data. The Director presented a report
showing all virus isolates identified to date from across the state as well as
from other New England States. The Director also briefed the Commission
relative to the pending impacts of Hurricane Danny. The Commission agreed that
if field investigations indicated a need, that the Project should consider a
late season aerial larval control application. The Commission unanimously
accepted the Fieldwork Accomplished Report on a motion by Mr. Pollack, seconded
by Mr. Jacques.
The
Commission agreed to hold their next two regular meeting on Thursday, September
17, 2009 and Thursday, October 22, 2009 in the office of the Project at 4:00
P.M.
At
5:17 P.M. the meeting was adjourned on a motion by Mrs. Chapell.
Respectfully submitted,
Linda
R. Shea, Chairman
Commission
Meeting
July
16, 2009
The
Meeting was called to order at 4:00 P.M. in the office of the Project.
Those
present were: Linda
R. Shea, Chairman
Maureen
P. MacEachern
Robin
L. Chapell
Richard
J. Pollack
Norman
P. Jacques
John
J. Smith, Director
The
minutes of the June 11, 2009 Commission meeting were unanimously accepted on a
motion by Mr. Jacques, seconded by Mrs. MacEachern.
The
Budgetary Control Report was presented to the Commission by the Director. The
Director reported to the Commission the results of a poll taken with the member
community’s boards of health relative to step/COLA increases. The poll
indicated that more than half the communities granted either a COLA or step
increase to their municipal employees. A statistical analysis of the polled
numbers indicated a “mode” of 2.5 percent. Following a discussion of these
results and a review of similar actions
at other mosquito control districts, the Commission agreed unanimously, on a
motion by Mrs. Chapell, seconded by Mr. Jacques, to grant all employees of the
Project a 2.5% COLA increase effective immediately. On a motion by Mrs. Chapell, seconded by Mr.
Pollack, the Commission unanimously agreed to instruct the Director to seek
additional information from some of the respondents whose town either had not
acted on increases or who were not originally asked the complete question as to
whether they had granted either a COLA and/or a step increase. The Commission
felt this was important so as to have a complete analysis of employee pay rates
across the Projects service area. Following a brief review of all expenses
incurred, to date, in FY 2009 the Commission unanimously accepted the Budgetary
Control Report on a motion by Mrs. MacEachern, seconded by Mr. Jacques.
The
Commission then reviewed the Fieldwork Accomplished Report. The Director
briefed the Commission relative to the results of surveillance conducted this
season. The Director reported that no virus isolates have been identified in
the Projects service area so far this season. The number of pools submitted has
been low due to poor weather conditions limiting collections and/or depressing
mosquito populations. The Commission then considered recent events which had
taken place in
As
informational Commissioner Pollack mention that he had spoken with Director Tim
Deschamps at the Central Mass Mosquito Control Project relative to a video the
Central Mass Project was preparing as a public relations tool. The Commission
suggested that the Director speak with Mr. Deschamps for further information
and to see if there was a possibility of a collaborative effort with the
Norfolk County Mosquito Control Project.
Under
New/Old Business, the Commission reviewed a written request from Caroline
Haviland relative to working four days per week for the next year to
accommodate her child care schedule. The Commission instructed the Director to
inquire of the DAR Human Resources Manager as to how this would affect accrual
of vacation and sick leave as well as any impacts to retirement. Several
Commissioners noted that on the municipal level these items are usually
prorated based on the hours worked per week. The Commission unanimously agreed,
on a motion by Mrs. Chapell, seconded by Mrs. MacEachern to accept Caroline’s
request following a determination of (and Caroline’s notification of) these
impacts to her employment benefits.
The
Commission agreed to hold their next regular meeting on Thursday, August 27,
2009 in the office of the Project at 4:00 P.M.
At
5:18 P.M. the meeting was adjourned on a motion by Mr. Jacques.
Respectfully submitted,
Linda
R. Shea, Chairman
Commission
Meeting
June
11, 2009
The
Meeting was called to order at 4:00 P.M. in the office of the Project.
Those
present were: Linda
R. Shea, Chairman
Maureen
P. MacEachern
Robin
L. Chapell
Richard
J. Pollack
Norman
P. Jacques
John
J. Smith, Director
The
minutes of the May 30, 2009 Commission meeting were unanimously accepted on a
motion by Mr. Pollack, seconded by Mrs. Chapell.
The
Budgetary Control Report was presented to the Commission by the Director. The
Director inquired of the Commission if they were considering either a Cost of
Living adjustment (COLA) or a step increase for the employees of the Project.
The Commission debated the merits of this and instructed the Director to
correspond with each of the member communities’ Boards of Health for the
purpose of determining what pay increase each town has offered for Fiscal Year
2010. The Commission then took the following action:
On a motion by Mrs. Chapell, seconded by Mrs.
MacEachern, the Commission unanimously decided that if more than half the Communities
in the Project’s service area offered pay increases to their employees, then
the Commission would offer an increase to the Project employees.
On a motion by Mr. Pollack, seconded by Mr. Jacques,
the Commission unanimously agreed that to calculate this increase the Director
would determine “the mode” of the percent increases offered by the towns.
Following
a review of the Director’s estimate of the rollover amounts from Fiscal Year
2009 to Fiscal Year 2010, the Commission accepted the Budgetary Control Report
on a motion by Mr. Jacques, seconded by Mrs. Chapell.
Next the Commission reviewed the Fieldwork
Accomplished Report. The Director first provided the Commission with the DAR
Commissioners response to the NCMCP Commissions resolution relative to the
vacating of the EPA Final Rule by the Sixth District Court. The Commission
agreed that this response was adequate to allow the Project to continue
operations while under the “potential” threat of possible litigation. The
Director then briefed the Commission on the American Mosquito Control
Associations “official” update of the actions taken by the EPA as well as other
interested parties relative to the vacating of this Final Rule as well as the
“potential impacts” these actions may have on mosquito control operations
across the country. Following a report of field activities accomplished
year-to-date the Commission unanimously accepted the Fieldwork Accomplished
Report on a motion by Mrs. Chapell, seconded by Mrs. MacEachern.
As
informational the Director briefed the Commission on the most recent meeting of
State Reclamation and Mosquito Control Board. The Director noted that the main
issue was tracking the size of rollovers of certain Mosquito Control Projects
(not NCMCP) which the Board considered excessive.
The
Commission agreed to hold their next regular meeting on Thursday, July 16, 2009
in the office of the Project at 4:00 P.M.
At
4:54 P.M. the meeting was adjourned on a motion by Mr. Jacques.
Respectfully submitted,
Linda
R. Shea, Chairman
Commission
Meeting
May
30, 2009
The
Meeting was called to order at 4:00 P.M. in the office of the Project.
Those
present were: Linda
R. Shea, Chairman
Maureen
P. MacEachern
Robin
L. Chapell
Richard
J. Pollack
Norman
P. Jacques
John
J. Smith, Director
The
minutes of the April 13, 2009 Commission meeting were unanimously accepted on a
motion by Mrs. Chapell, seconded by Mrs. MacEachern.
The
Commission then reviewed the Budgetary Control Report. The Director reviewed
with the Commission the recent Town Meeting in the Town of
Next the Commission reviewed the Fieldwork
Accomplished Report which included a review by the Assistant Director of the
aerial larvicide application conducted in mid-April.
The Director noted that pre and post larval counts showed very good results and
that a report would be placed on the website as soon as possible. The
Commission then debated the ramifications of the Clean Water Act relative to
the Sixth District Court action. Commissioner Pollack presented to the
Commission a resolution he had prepared. Following a lengthy debate the
Commission unanimously agreed to adopt the resolution, as presented, on a
motion by Mr. Pollack, seconded by Mrs. Shea. The Commission further agreed
unanimously, on a motion by Mrs. Chapell, seconded by Mrs. MacEachern to have
Commissioner Pollack send the resolution on behalf of the Commission to the
State Reclamation and Mosquito Control Board. The Commission instructed the
Director to forward this resolution to all the Massachusetts Mosquito Control
Districts for their review. After a review of the fieldwork accomplished year
to date, the report was unanimously accepted, on a motion by Mrs. Chapell,
seconded by Mr. Jacques.
The
Commission agreed to hold their next regular meeting on Thursday, June 11, 2009
in the office of the Project at 4:00 P.M.
At
5:16 P.M. the meeting was adjourned on a motion by Mr. Jacques.
Respectfully submitted,
Linda
R. Shea, Chairman
Commission
Meeting
April
13, 2009
The
Meeting was called to order at 4:00 P.M. in the office of the Project.
Those
present were: Linda
R. Shea, Chairman
Maureen
P. MacEachern
Robin
L. Chapell
Richard
J. Pollack
John
J. Smith, Director
The
minutes of the April 19, 2009 Commission meeting were unanimously accepted on a
motion by Mrs. Chapell, seconded by Mr. Pollack.
Next
the Commission reviewed the Budgetary Control Report. The Director reviewed
with the Commission the cost of the upcoming aerial application as well as
expected insecticide purchases to replace depleted Bti
stocks in advance of any potential summer applications. The Director indicated
that he would be conducting a budget review post aerial application for the
purpose of determining the level of funding which would be remaining for
rollover (if any) at the end of the current fiscal year. The Commission then
unanimously accepted the Budgetary Control Report on a motion by Mrs.
MacEachern, seconded by Mrs. Chapell.
The Fieldwork Accomplished Report was then
reviewed by the Commission. The Director briefed the Commission on pending
options relative to court action on the vacating of the EPA’s final rule of the
Clean Water Act. The Commission
instructed the Director to monitor the EPA website and to email or call Joe
Conlon at the American Mosquito Control Association if no action had been taken
prior to the aerial application. After a review of the fieldwork accomplished
year to date, the report was unanimously accepted, on a motion by Mr. Pollack,
seconded by Mrs. MacEachern.
At
4:35 P.M. the meeting was adjourned on a motion by Mrs. Chapell.
Respectfully submitted,
Linda
R. Shea, Chairman
Commission
Meeting
March
19, 2009
The
Meeting was called to order at 4:00 P.M. in the office of the Project.
Those
present were: Linda
R. Shea, Chairman
Maureen
P. MacEachern
Robin
L. Chapell
Norman
P. Jacques
Richard
J. Pollack
John
J. Smith, Director
Caroline
Haviland, Water Management Program Coordinator
The
minutes of the January 22, 2009 Commission meeting were unanimously accepted on
a motion by Mrs. MacEachern, seconded by Mr. Pollack.
The Commission then considered agenda item #4, a
review of the Family and Medical Leave Act. The Commission reviewed with
Caroline Haviland her application for FMLA leave. The Commission noted receipt
of a letter from Caroline detailing her thoughts relative to the administrations
handling of her FMLA paperwork. The Commission determined at this time that
Caroline’s FMLA request had been approved by the Department of Agricultural
Resources, Human Resources Division and that no further action was needed. The
Director noted that he had instructed the Assistant Director to research the
required postings for FMLA as well as all other labor law legal postings and to
bring the Project into compliance with these posting requirements. The
Commission then considered the need for Caroline to participate from time to
time in water management activities during her leave. After a lengthy
discussion relative to ongoing water management issues, Commissioner Chapell
made the following motion:
If, on rare occasions during
Caroline’s FMLA leave, issues arise relative to water management the Assistant
Director may, at his discretion, request the assistance of the Water Management
Program Coordinator. The Assistant Director will be responsible for determining
the need for, and duration of, this time which will be reimbursed as “comp
time”.
This motion was seconded by Mr. Jacques and agreed
to unanimously.
The Commission then went back to agenda item #2, the
Budgetary Control Report. The Director informed the Commission that he had
received correspondence from the Department of Public Health (DPH) relative to
continued funding of the arbovirus surveillance
program, specifically the funding of mosquito collections submitted by the
mosquito control districts. The Director noted that no formal announcement has
been received but that the projects were asked to submit letter of support to
DPH. The Director reviewed with the Commission letters which had been sent to
DPH from several projects. Commissioner Pollack questioned whether we had been
charged for the two pools we submitted over the 400 pool limit during the 2008
season. The Director noted that he did not believe we had been charged but
would ask at the next DPH meeting. The Commission then unanimously accepted the
Budgetary Control Report on a motion by Mr. Jacques, seconded by Mrs.
MacEachern.
The Fieldwork Accomplished Report was then
reviewed by the Commission. The Director had prepared for the Commission a
thorough review of all activities on-going and pertinent to the vacating of the
EPA’s final rule relative to the Clean Water Act. The Director noted that the deadline for
appeals (rehearing) is April 9th. The Director indicated to the
Commission that if the court refuses to rehear the decision to vacate the rule
under appeal that this would interfere with both larval control and adult
control operations. The Commission agreed to meet shortly after the deadline to
review their options. The Director then briefed the Commission on a meeting
recently held with Dr. Sam Telford who has been charged with updating the
GEIR/SRP. The Director noted that most of the mosquito control districts,
including
As informational, the Director informed the
Commission that the Secretary of EOEEA declared that there would be no “out of
state” travel allowed except for emergencies. The Director noted that this
would result in no NCMCP representation at the upcoming American Mosquito
Control Association meeting. The Commission set the next regular meetings of the
Commission for the following days:
Monday, April 13, 2009 in
the office of the Project at 4:00 P.M.
and
Wednesday, May 20, 2009 in
the office of the Project at 4:00 P.M.
At 5:20 P.M. the meeting was adjourned on a motion
by Mrs. Shea.
Respectfully submitted,
Linda
R. Shea, Chairman
There
was no February 2009 Commission meeting.
Commission
Meeting
January
22, 2009
The
Meeting was called to order at 4:00 P.M. in the office of the Project.
Those
present were: Linda
R. Shea, Chairman
Maureen
P. MacEachern
Robin
L. Chapell
Norman
P. Jacques
Richard
J. Pollack
John
J. Smith, Director
The
minutes of the November 20, 2008 Commission meeting were unanimously accepted
on a motion by Mr. Jacques, seconded by Mrs. MacEachern.
The Commission then considered new officers for
2009. On a motion by Mrs. Chapell, seconded by Mr. Jacques, the Commission
unanimously voted to appoint
Next the Commission reviewed the Budgetary Control
Report. The Director informed the Commission that all employees of the Project
participated in the IPM Webinar presented by the American Mosquito Control
Association. The Director noted that this webinar was very informative
especially for the field staff and that it reinforced the fact that the Project
is following most of the IPM guidelines outlined in the webinar. The Commission
agreed that the webinar was an important tool to help Project personnel better
assess where the Projects strengths and weaknesses were relative to IPM. The
Director also informed the Commission that the State Reclamation and Mosquito
Control Boards sent out a memo suggesting all mosquito control districts
consider level funding their operating budgets for Fiscal Year 2010. The
Commission felt, given the economic hardships facing the member communities,
that level funding was the prudent thing to do and instructed the Director to
modify and resubmit the FY2010 Spending Plan reflecting level funding.
Following a request by the Assistant Director to upgrade the GIS mapping
software to ArcView 9.0, the Commission unanimously
accepted the Budgetary Control Report on a motion by Mrs. MacEachern, seconded
by Mr. Pollack.
The Fieldwork Accomplished Report was then
reviewed by the Commission. The Director informed the Commission that a panel
of three judges within the United State Court of Appeals for the Sixth District
threw out the Final Rule of the EPA relative to the Clean Water Act. The
Director noted that the EPA’s Final Rule exempted mosquito control programs
from filing for a National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System (“NPDES”) permit under the Clean Water Act while conducting pesticide
applications near or in wetlands of the
One employee of the
department of environmental protection designated by its commissioner, one employee
of the department of food and agriculture designated by its commissioner and
one employee of the department of fish and game designated by its commissioner
and two employees of the department of public health designated by its
commissioner, one of whom represents environmental health shall constitute the
state mosquito- borne disease control board
The Commission instructed the Director to
keep them informed as this bill advances within the legislative process. The Commission
unanimously accepted the Fieldwork Accomplished Report, on a motion by Mr.
Jacques, seconded by Mrs. Shea.
The Commission set the next regular meeting of the
Commission for Thursday, March 19, 2009 in the office of the Project at 4:00
P.M.
At 4:57 P.M. the meeting was adjourned on a motion
by Mrs. Chapell.
Respectfully submitted,
Linda
R. Shea, Chairman
There
was no December 2008 Commission meeting.
Commission
Meeting November
20, 2008
The
Meeting was called to order at 3:30 P.M. in the office of the Project.
Those
present were: Richard
J. Pollack, Chairman
Linda
R. Shea
Maureen
P. MacEachern
Robin
L. Chapell
Norman
P. Jacques
John
J. Smith, Director
The
minutes of the October 23, 2008 Commission meeting were unanimously accepted on
a motion by Mrs. Chapell, seconded by Mrs. MacEachern.
The Commission began the review of the Budgetary
Control Report by reviewing the recent decision by the Commissioner of the
Department of Agricultural Resources (DAF) to restrict the number of NCMCP
employees/Commissioners who may attend the Northeastern Mosquito Control
Association to be held in
The Fieldwork Accomplished Report was then reviewed
by the Commission. The Director, Assistant Director and Commissioner Pollack
all briefed the Commission relative to discussions with Coastal Zone
Management. The Commission was briefed on the conditions Coastal Zone
Management wishes to place on monitoring of future Open Marsh Water Management
(OMWM) projects. The Commission was informed that future approval of OMWM
permits will be subject to these new monitoring conditions. The Commission also
reviewed an excel spreadsheet detailing all fieldwork accomplished for the year
to date. Following review of this document the Commission unanimously accepted
the Fieldwork Accomplished Report, on a motion by Mr. Jacques, seconded by Mrs.
MacEachern.
The Commission set the next regular meetings of the
Commission for Thursday, January 22, 2009 and Thursday, March 19, 2009 in the
office of the Project at 4:00 P.M. There will be no regular meetings scheduled
for December 2008 or February 2009.
At 4:30 P.M. the meeting was adjourned on a motion
by Mrs. Shea.
Respectfully submitted,
Richard
J. Pollack, Chairman
Commission
Meeting
October
23, 2008
The
Meeting was called to order at 4:00 P.M. in the office of the Project.
Those
present were: Richard
J. Pollack, Chairman
Linda
R. Shea
Maureen
P. MacEachern
Robin
L. Chapell
Norman
P. Jacques
John
J. Smith, Director
The
minutes of the
The Commission then considered the Budgetary Control
Report. The Director began the review by presenting to the Commission graphs
depicting spending levels in all major categories for the past five years.
These included payroll, payroll related expenses such as group insurance and
retirement, space rental, insecticides and aircraft contracting expenses. The
Commission discussed these expenses and once again determined that given state
wide budget cuts, the budgets presented by the Director for the past five years
have in fact, been lean and that their is no place for further cuts without
causing major disruptions to current services. As part of this review, the
Director also presented to the Commission a graphical review of services
rendered to the member communities over the past ten years. Following a review
of certain 9C budget cuts proposed by the Governor, the Commission unanimously agreed
to accept the Budgetary Control Report on a motion by Mrs. MacEachern, seconded
by Mrs. Shea.
The Fieldwork Accomplished Report was then reviewed
by the Commission. As noted above, the Commission reviewed graphs depicting
services rendered over the past ten years that included water management,
larval control, adult control and surveillance
activities. The Director noted that the Project had submitted 401 pools of
mosquitoes to the State Department of Public Health for virus analysis this
season. It was noted that this exceeded the State’s limit by one although this
would have been substantially higher if EEE transmission had been more intense
this season. The Commission was also briefed on the year-to-date fieldwork
accomplished during which the Director noted that all field activities were in
the area of water management both by hand and mechanized. Upon completion of
the fieldwork briefings and discussion, the Commission unanimously accepted the
Fieldwork Accomplished Report, on a motion by Mr. Jacques, seconded by Mrs.
Shea.
Under new/old business, Commissioner Pollack, as
chair, asked the Director to brief the Commission relative to the last State
Reclamation and Mosquito Control Board (SRMCB) meeting held on
On October 23, 2008,
1)
ascertain the level of satisfaction of
each community (as concluded by the BOH/DOH contact) with the NCMCP, and to
invite town representatives to offer any questions and comments pertinent to
the NCMCP;
2)
obtain insight regarding municipal
employee compensation issues in light of recent fiscal constraints;
3)
Gather opinion regarding whether NCMCP
personnel and operation issues should be decided regionally or by the state.
For each call, the
highest-ranking official available was asked to offer comment. These included: Needham -
In response to questions regarding
satisfaction with the project, the respondents reported, without exception,
exceptionally positive experiences.
Respondents reported that: they were ‘very happy’, ‘very pleased’, and
‘satisfied’ with the project and project activities; project director Smith,
assistant director Lawson, and other project personnel were ‘very responsive’,
‘accommodating’, ‘most helpful, informed and polite’ and did a ‘phenomenal
job’; and the NCMCP website was ‘great’.
When pressed for complaints or concerns, none of the respondents could
think of a problem. Commissioner Pollack
concluded that BOH/DOH officials in member communities universally had the
highest regard for the NCMCP, officers and personnel.
Regarding financial issues, respondents in
Finally, every respondent advocated
that the NCMCP Commission should render decisions pertaining to the finances
and operation of the NCMCP. Without
exception, each suggested that s/he believed the Commission was, and would
continue to be, more likely aware and more responsive to the needs and desires
of the communities and their residents.
Commissioner Pollack made the
following motion:
That he had made contact with
representatives of many of the member towns
and without exception they were in agreement that the Commission be
responsible for personnel decisions including, but
not limited to the hiring and firing of personnel; the establishment of rates
of compensation for personnel representative of the regional economy; and the
hiring of appropriate outside professionals pursuant to Outside Section 73, of
the 2009 State Budget; that it was clear to this Commission that we have
authority to make decisions given to us under Outside Section 73, and that as
duly appointed Commissioners, we expect the State Reclamation and Mosquito
Control Board to abide by our decisions and process them as they occur.
This motion was
seconded by Mrs. Chapell and agreed to unanimously.
The next regular meeting of the Commission will be
on Thursday, November 20, 2008 in the office of the Project at 3:30 P.M.
At 5:30 P.M. the meeting was adjourned on a motion
by Mr. Jacques.
Respectfully submitted,
Richard
J. Pollack, Chairman
There
was no September 2008 Commission meeting.
Commission
Meeting August
21, 2008
The
Meeting was called to order at 4:00 P.M. in the office of the Project.
Those
present were: Richard
J. Pollack, Chairman
Linda
R. Shea
Maureen
P. MacEachern
Robin
L. Chapell
Norman
P. Jacques
John
J. Smith, Director
The
minutes of the July 17, 2008 Commission meeting were unanimously accepted on a
motion by Mrs. Chapell, seconded by Mr. Jacques.
The Commission then reviewed the Budgetary Control
Report. The Commission discussed the memo they had received from the Chairman
of the State Reclamation and Mosquito Control Board (SRMCB) relative to the new
salary legislation just passed by the state legislators. On a motion by Mrs.
Chapell, seconded by Mr. Jacques, the Commission agreed unanimously to have the
Chairman draft a letter to the Chairman of SRMCB asking for clarification as to
if the SRMCB has requested an assessment from the Department of Agricultural
Resources (DAR) relative to the override of outside section 73. The letter
would also request a time table as to when a response would be forthcoming and
request a copy of DAR counsel’s written response once available. The Commission
also discussed the interruption of internet email due to a late payment to
Verizon. The Commission unanimously agreed, on a motion by Mr. Pollack,
seconded by Mrs. Chapell, to have the Chairman send a letter to the SRMCB
requesting that they revisit the possibility of providing both email accounts
and website space to each district so as to avoid future disruptions of this
kind. Upon completion of a review of the ongoing transition between Fiscal Year
2008 and Fiscal Year 2009, the Commission unanimously agreed to accept the
Budgetary Control Report on a motion by Mr. Jacques, seconded by Mrs. Chapell.
The Fieldwork Accomplished Report was then reviewed
by the Commission. The Director reviewed the current status of the surveillance
program with the Commission including details as to EEE and WNv
isolations. Once the Director finished his review of all fieldwork conducted
since the last Commission meeting, the Commission then unanimously accepted the
Fieldwork Accomplished Report, on a motion by Mrs. Chapell, seconded by Mr.
Jacques.
The next regular meeting of the Commission will be
on Thursday, September 18, 2008 in the office of the Project at 4:00 P.M.
At 4:55 P.M. the meeting was adjourned on a motion
by Mr. Jacques.
Respectfully submitted,
Richard
J. Pollack, Chairman
Commission
Meeting
July
17, 2008
The
Meeting was called to order at 4:00 P.M. in the office of the Project.
Those
present were: Richard
J. Pollack, Chairman
Linda
R. Shea
Maureen
P. MacEachern
Robin
L. Chapell
Norman
P. Jacques
John
J. Smith, Director
The
minutes of the May 29, 2008 Commission meeting were unanimously accepted on a
motion by Mrs. Chapell, seconded by Mrs. MacEachern.
The Commission then reviewed the Budgetary Control
Report. The Commission further discussed the ramifications of a budget increase
for FY 2009 held to a cap of 2.5%. On a motion by Mr. Pollack, seconded by Mrs.
Shea, the Commission agreed unanimously to place in the minutes a request
urging the State Reclamation and Mosquito Control Board to convene meetings as
soon as the season ends to address the issue of whether the districts are in
fact subject to this 2.5% levy cap and if so how the mosquito control districts
can operating under this condition without a clearly defined override
mechanism. Following a lengthy discussion relative to effects this cap will
have on the FY 2009 operations, the Commission unanimously accepted the
Budgetary Control Report on a motion by Mrs. MacEachern, seconded by Mrs.
Chapell.
The Fieldwork Accomplished Report was then reviewed
by the Commission. The Director reviewed with the Commission the current status
of the surveillance program relative to virus isolations. The Director noted
that the surveillance program was fully operational and as of the date of the
meeting no WNv or EEE had been identified in mosquito
collections. The Director noted as part of the Fieldwork Accomplished report
that the field staff was making good progress toward treating rain basins in
higher urban areas of the county in an effort to reduce larval production of Culex in these
structures. The Commission then unanimously accepted the Fieldwork Accomplished
Report, on a motion by Mr. Jacques, seconded by Mrs. Shea.
The Commission then
considered new/old business at which time the Commission entered into a
discussion relative to public relations. On a motion by Mrs. Chapell, seconded
by Mrs. Shea, the Commission unanimously agreed to place in the minutes a
request that the State Reclamation and Mosquito Control Board put on their
agenda in the near future consideration of coordinating efforts relative to
public relations. The Commission feels it would be much more effective to have
the board conduct a coordinated effort rather than each district speaking with
separate voices.
The next regular meeting of the Commission will be
on Thursday, August 21, 2008 in the office of the Project at 4:00 P.M.
At 4:50 P.M. the meeting was adjourned on a motion
by Mrs. MacEachern.
Respectfully submitted,
Richard
J. Pollack, Chairman
There
was no June 2008 Commission meeting.
Commission
Meeting May
29, 2008
The
Meeting was called to order at 4:00 P.M. in the office of the Project.
Those
present were: Richard
J. Pollack, Chairman
Linda
R. Shea
Maureen
P. MacEachern
Robin
L. Chapell
Norman
P. Jacques
John
J. Smith, Director
The minutes of the April 30, 2008 Commission meeting
were unanimously accepted on a motion by Mrs. MacEachern, seconded by Mrs. Shea.
Mr. Jacques abstained from this vote.
The Commission then reviewed the Budgetary Control
Report. The Commission considered a request from the State Reclamation and
Mosquito Control Board (SRMCB) to reduce the FY 2009 Budget Request to 2.5%.
After a lengthy debate the Commission agreed to reduce the request to 2.5% on a
motion by Mr. Jacques, seconded by Mrs. Shea. The Commission wished it to
appear in the minutes that reducing the budget to this level could impact
“core” services and that this budget would be extremely lean. Commissioner
Chapell noted concern that if the summer is warm and wet then the Project could
be faced with an inability to appropriately respond to a public health threat
if present. The Commission instructed the Director to monitor this budget
carefully for any impacts to services which might affect the Projects response
to any mosquito transmitted virus threat. The Commission also expressed their
concern relative to the application of Prop. 2.5 to the Projects budget since
Prop. 2.5 is a cap on property levies. The Commission noted that Prop 2.5 has
an override mechanism for towns but that a similar mechanism for mosquito
control districts would be virtually impossible to operate under. The
Commission questioned how an override would function if scenarios such as
receiving override approval from certain towns governing bodies and not others
were realized. The Commission felt that there needs to be much more discussion
relative to this 2.5% cap and how this will function under a cherry sheet
system of assessment.
The Commission then considered a cost of living
increase for the employees. On a motion by Mrs. Shea, seconded by Mrs. Chapell,
the Commission unanimously agreed to grant all employees a 3% COLA effective
July 1, 2008. The Commission noted that a lack of a step increases under the
SRMCB imposed salary moratorium could result in a real hardship to the Project
employees.
The Fieldwork Accomplished Report was then reviewed
by the Commission. The Assistant Director reviewed with the Commission a new
fieldwork accomplished category called “Intensive Hand Cleaning”. As the
Assistant Director noted this new category better describes work done by
employees that is more intensive than ordinary ditch cleaning. This work requires
more preliminary investigation and preparation by the Water Management Project
Coordinator and is much more labor intensive for the field employees. The
Commission then unanimously accepted the Fieldwork Accomplished Report on a
motion by Mrs. MacEachern, seconded by Mr. Jacques.
Next the Commission entered
into a discussion relative to Commission Protocol specifically as it relates to
communication with the public and other boards. Following a lengthy review of
when Commissioners may act on behalf of the Commission or as individuals, the
Commission agreed to work on a written protocol for future reference.
The Commission then
considered new/old business. The Director entered into a discussion with the
Commission relative to an Atlantic White Cedar restoration project which has
been proposed in the Town of
The next regular meeting of the Commission will be
on Thursday, July 17, 2008 in the office of the Project at 4:00 P.M.
At 5:20 P.M. the meeting was adjourned on a motion
by Mrs. MacEachern.
Respectfully submitted,
Richard
J. Pollack, Chairman
Norfolk
County Mosquito Control Project
Commission
Meeting
April
30, 2008
The
Meeting was called to order at 4:30 P.M. in the office of the Project.
Those
present were: Richard
J. Pollack, Chairman
Linda
R. Shea
Maureen
P. MacEachern
Robin
L. Chapell